Case Study · Telegram Bot · Telegram Ads

Case Telegram Ads: YuraArbitraz_Bot — CPA from €0.61

Operational case study TG Target: official advertisement Telegram Ads for the bot t.me/YuraArbitraz_Bot. CPC = click on the bot, CPA = Action in the funnel. 6727 Actions, media ≈ €9,030, blended CPA ≈ €1.34; Active pool — CPA ≈ €1.19.

Case YuraArbitraz_Bot × Telegram Ads: destination — t.me/YuraArbitraz_Bot. There are 15 campaigns on the screen: 6727 Actions, media ≈ €9 030, blended CPA ≈ €1.34. The best cell — RU · Education · Static: CPA €0.61, 886 Actions. Active in the snapshot — 12 campaigns (5835 Actions, CPA ≈ €1.19). CPC — click on the bot; CPA — target action (Actions). Snapshot, not a forecast.

ケースの要点

  • Bot destination: CPC ≈ €0.22–€0.50, CPA Actions ≈ €0.61–€1.56 in Active.
  • Education + Static — leader in CPA (RU €0.61, UA €1.05).
  • 6727 Actions for ≈ €9k media — portfolio scale, not just one creative.
  • Stopped Video-cells — CPA €2.09–€2.51 vs Active Static/Crypto ≈ €1.1.
  • GEO matrix: RU, RU-EU, UA, UZ, KZ, BY — separate ad title per cell.

1. Industry → Budget → Goal → Strategy → Results → Lessons

Industry

Telegram bot: traffic arbitrage / performance community. Monetization — inside the bot after Action.

Budget

≈ €9,030 media on the visible portfolio (15 campaigns). Active ≈ €6,930.

Goal

Minimize CPA Actions with the growth of subscriptions/starts in the bot.

Strategy

GEO × theme (Crypto / Trading / Education) × format (Static / Video / Text); bot link; hold Active with the best CPA.

Results

6727 Actions · CPA €1.34 · best cell €0.61 · Active CPA €1.19.

Lessons

Education Static > hype Video in a number of GEO; kill by CPA; bot CR after click decides the economy.

2. Metrics: CPC and CPA

指標In the bot case
CPCSpent ÷ Clicks — CPC at t.me/YuraArbitraz_Bot
CPASpent ÷ Actions — the price of one target action in the bot funnel
CTRClicks ÷ Views — relevance of the creative to the channel
Click → Action CRActions ÷ Clicks — the quality of the onboarding bot after a click

3. Top Active campaigns on the screenshot

キャンペーンGEOClicksActionsCTRCPCCPASpent
RU · Education · StaticRU2 4208862.28%€0.22€0.61€540.36
UA · Education · StaticUA2 2237701.49%€0.36€1.05€808.50
UZ · Crypto · Static · ProfitUZ1 8377121.68%€0.43€1.12€797.17
KZ · Channels · TextKZ1 9277002.04%€0.50€1.38€966.40
RU-EU · Trading · StaticRU-EU2 2926752.11%€0.46€1.56€1,052.40

4. Stopped vs Active

プールSpendActionsBlended CPA
Active (12 campaigns)≈ €6 9305835≈ €1.19
Stopped (3 on the screen)≈ €2 100892≈ €2.35
Full slice (15 campaigns)≈ €9 0306727≈ €1.34

Stoppedの例

  • UZ · Education · Video: 261 Actions, CPA €2.51, spent €654.86
  • BY · Trading · Video: 451 Actions, CPA €2.37, spent €1,068.86
  • RU · Channels · Text: 180 Actions, CPA €2.09, spent €376.69

5. Lessons for bot UA in Telegram Ads

  • Primary KPI = Actions, not clicks and not 'advertiser channel subscribers'.
  • Static education angles are often cheaper than Video with comparable GEO.
  • Crypto + Profit / Channels + Text — strong bundles in UZ/KZ/BY.
  • Stopped is not a 'launch failure' — it's a normal part of the matrix test at multi-GEO scale.
  • Bot onboarding after deeplink — half the economy CPA.

Short version for users: /cases. Neighboring site-case: Crypixchange.

FAQ

What is the Telegram Ads case for YuraArbitraz_Bot?

Operational slice of @@Telegram Ads7@@-office Telegram Ads for the bot t.me/YuraArbitraz_Bot: destination — Telegram bot, primary KPI — Actions (target action in the bot funnel after click). In the screenshot 6727 Actions with media ≈ €9,030 (CPA ≈ €1.34). Active campaigns (12 pcs.) — CPA ≈ €1.19. Snapshot, not SLA.

How does CPC differ from CPA in the bot case?

CPC — cost per click in the bot (Spent ÷ Clicks). CPA — cost of one Action (Spent ÷ Actions). Click ≠ target action: some users drop off before start/subscription. In top cells click→action CR ≈ 35–40%.

What is the best CPA the bot showed in Telegram Ads?

The best CPA in the screenshot is €0.61 in RU · Education · Static (886 Actions, €540.36 spent, CTR 2.28%). Next: UA Education Static €1.05, UZ Crypto Static €1.12, KZ Channels Text €1.38. All — Active at the time of the snapshot.

Why did Education Static surpass Video in terms of GEO?

Static + education angle gives a clear promise of 'what you will get in the bot' without overloading the video. UZ Education Video (Stopped) — CPA €2.51 vs UZ Crypto Static Active €1.12. BY Trading Video Stopped €2.37 vs BY Crypto Text Active €1.10. Pattern: format×angle fit is more important than a 'beautiful' video CTR.

Which GEO worked in the case?

RU, RU-EU, UA, UZ, KZ, BY — language/geo clusters Euro-cabinet. UA Education Static — 770 Actions; UZ Crypto — 712; RU Education — 886. Multi-GEO portfolio, but each cell is a separate ad title with UTM for reconciliation.

How much did it cost to click on the bot?

Blended CPC across 15 campaigns ≈ €0.45. In the best Active — €0.22–€0.46. Stopped BY Trading Video — CPC €0.74 at CPA €2.37: expensive click without strong CR in Action.

Is it possible to repeat CPA €0.61 on another bot?

No as a guarantee. We repeat the method: bot destination, GEO×format matrix, education/crypto/trading angles, kill by CPA, hold Active with the best CPA. Depends on the bot offer, onboarding, and channel quality. Pilot is mandatory.

How is the bot case different from the site case (Crypix)?

Crypix — site destination, CPA = exchange. YuraArbitraz — bot destination, CPA = Action in the bot. CPC is cheaper (€0.22–€0.50 vs €0.33–€0.59), CPA is also lower (€0.61–€1.56 vs €3.41–€4.07) — different funnel and different primary event. Compare only within the same type of destination.

Launch Telegram Ads on the bot?

Let's collect the GEO×format matrix, configure Actions, and show CPA by Active campaigns — as in the YuraArbitraz case.