Case Study · Telegram Bot EN · Telegram Ads
Case Telegram Ads: YuraArbitrage_Bot — CPA from €1.08
English version of the bot t.me/YuraArbitrage_Bot in @@Telegram Ads7@@-cabinet Telegram Ads: CPC = click in the bot, CPA = Action. 6457 Actions, media ≈ €10,583, blended CPA ≈ €1.64; Active pool — CPA ≈ €1.57. @@Telegram Ads9@@: TR, CA, AU, FR, DE, NL, ES, EU.
Case YuraArbitrage_Bot × Telegram Ads: destination — t.me/YuraArbitrage_Bot (English version). Screenshot shows 16 campaigns: 6457 Actions, media ≈ €10 583, blended CPA ≈ €1.64. Best cell — DE · Crypto · Video: CPA €1.08. Active — 13 campaigns (5826 Actions, CPA ≈ €1.57). Twin portfolio to the RU/CIS case YuraArbitraz_Bot. Snapshot, not forecast.
Punti chiave del case
- EN bot destination: 6457 Actions on ≈ €10.6k media, CPA ≈ €1.64.
- The best CPA — DE Crypto Video €1.08; volume — FR Crypto Static 682 Actions.
- Active CPA ≈ €1.57 vs Stopped ≈ €2.30 (−32% to the Action price in the working pool).
- GEO matrix: TR, CA, AU, FR, DE, NL, ES, EU — not a single 'English' bucket.
- Compare with the RU/CIS bot only as a twin portfolio: different auction competition.
1. Industry → Budget → Goal → Strategy → Results → Lessons
Telegram bot (EN): arbitration / performance community. Localization — English onboarding.
≈ €10,583 media on 16 screen campaigns. Active ≈ €9,131.
Cheap Actions in the EN-bot with multi-GEO scale without bloating CPA.
GEO × theme (Crypto / Trading / Education / Channels) × format (Video / Static / Text).
6457 Actions · CPA €1.64 · best cell €1.08 · Active CPA €1.57.
EN GEO is more expensive than CIS on blended CPA; kill Stopped €2.18–€2.63; volume ≠ best CPA.
2. Metrics: CPC and CPA
| Metrica | In the bot's EN case |
|---|---|
| CPC | Spent ÷ Clicks — click on t.me/YuraArbitrage_Bot (blended ≈ €0.49) |
| CPA | Spent ÷ Actions — the price of the target action in the EN-bot |
| CTR | 1.24–2.26% per cell; NL Trading Video — peak 2.26% |
| Click → Action CR | Actions ÷ Clicks — in the top ≈ 25–39% |
3. Top Active campaigns on the screenshot
| Campagna | GEO | Clicks | Actions | CTR | CPC | CPA | Spent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE · Crypto · Video | DE | 936 | 358 | 1.82% | €0.41 | €1.08 | €386.55 |
| CA · Channels · Text | CA | 1 614 | 635 | 2.04% | €0.46 | €1.16 | €736.41 |
| NL · Trading · Video | NL | 1 876 | 467 | 2.26% | €0.34 | €1.35 | €632.54 |
| CA · Crypto · Static | CA | 341 | 140 | 1.54% | €0.58 | €1.41 | €197.28 |
| FR · Crypto · Static · Profit | FR | 3 093 | 682 | 1.96% | €0.33 | €1.52 | €1,033.76 |
| ES · Education · Text | ES | 1 719 | 658 | 2.19% | €0.58 | €1.52 | €1,000.23 |
4. Active vs Stopped
| Pool | Spend | Actions | Blended CPA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active (13 campaigns) | ≈ €9 131 | 5826 | ≈ €1.57 |
| Stopped (3 on the screen) | ≈ €1 452 | 631 | ≈ €2.30 |
| Full slice (16 campaigns) | ≈ €10 583 | 6457 | ≈ €1.64 |
Esempi Stopped
- NL · Crypto · Static · Profit: 126 Actions, CPA €2.63, spent €331.46
- ES · Crypto · Video: 89 Actions, CPA €2.41, spent €214.51
- TR · Education · Text: 416 Actions, CPA €2.18, spent €906.34
5. Lessons for EN bot UA
- A separate EN bot + separate GEO cells are not 'one English ad for the whole world'.
- The best CPA and the best volume are often different cells (DE €1.08 vs FR 682 Actions).
- Stopped with CPA €2.2–€2.6 do not mix in the operating CPA report.
- Checking against the RU/CIS twin case is useful for capacity planning, not for copy-pasting rates.
Versione breve: /cases. RU/CIS twin: YuraArbitraz_Bot. Site-case: Crypixchange.
FAQ
What is the Telegram Ads case for YuraArbitrage_Bot?
Slice of @@Telegram Ads7@@-office Telegram Ads for the English version of the bot t.me/YuraArbitrage_Bot. Destination — bot, primary KPI — Actions after click. In the screenshot 6457 Actions at media ≈ €10,583 (CPA ≈ €1.64). Active (13 campaigns) — CPA ≈ €1.57. Snapshot, not SLA.
How does this case differ from YuraArbitraz_Bot?
The same product (arbitrage / performance community), but an EN-bot and EN/EU GEO: TR, CA, AU, FR, DE, NL, ES, EU. RU/CIS case (YuraArbitraz_Bot) gave CPA ≈ €1.34; EN-segment — ≈ €1.64. Different audience and auction competition, compare as a twin portfolio, not as "better/worse" in a vacuum.
How does CPC differ from CPA in the bot's EN case?
CPC — click price in t.me/YuraArbitrage_Bot (Spent ÷ Clicks). CPA — Action price (Spent ÷ Actions). Blended CPC ≈ €0.49; the best Active hold CPC €0.33–€0.46 at CPA €1.08–€1.52.
Which is the best CPA on the English bot?
The best CPA on the screenshot is €1.08 in DE · Crypto · Video (358 Actions, €386.55). Next: CA Channels Text €1.16, NL Trading Video €1.35, CA Crypto Static €1.41, FR Crypto Static €1.52 (682 Actions — the volume leader).
Which GEO worked in the EN case?
TR, CA, AU, FR, DE, NL, ES and broad EU. Volume: FR Crypto Static 682 Actions, ES Education Text 658, EU Crypto Video 651, CA Channels Text 635. Multi-GEO matrix with a separate ad title per cell.
Why part of the Stopped campaigns?
NL Crypto Static (€2.63), ES Crypto Video (€2.41), TR Education Text (€2.18) — CPA above the Active corridor ≈ €1.57. Stopped — a normal tail matrix test: not an “account failure,” but the disconnection of expensive bundles.
Is it possible to repeat CPA €1.08 on another EN bot?
No as a guarantee. We repeat the method: EN bot destination, GEO×theme×format, kill by CPA, scale Active. Numbers depend on the offer, onboarding, and auction GEO. Pilot is mandatory.
Which format is better in the EN slice: Video, Static or Text?
There is no single winner. DE Crypto Video — the best CPA; FR Crypto Static — the best volume at CPA €1.52; CA/ES Text — strong CTR and volume. The decision is based on CPA and n Actions at GEO, not on the 'average' format.
Need an EN-bot in Telegram Ads?
We will assemble the GEO×format matrix for an English audience and show CPA on Active — as in the YuraArbitrage_Bot case.